Browsing: <a href="/tag/site-contamination">Site contamination</a> <i class="grey">•</i> <a href="/tag/assessments-approvals-licensing">Assessments, approvals, licensing</a>

• NSW introduces waste levy discounts for clean fill, scrap metal residues
  
• Quarry operator has licence suspended
  
• NSW contaminated sites regulation updated

• WA to amend mine-site rehabilitation and disclosure rules
  
• RIS for NSW licensing reforms due out Monday
  
• NSW EPA seeks nominations for Hunter air committee

• Revamped vehicle emissions to deliver a $249m net benefit to Victoria
  
• WA mining regulator details priorities
  
• NSW declares two more sites contaminated

• AGL penalised for not making monitoring data public
  
• Environment ministers detail scope of packaging waste RIS
  
• WA mines department issues rehabilitation fund guidance

• Queensland rules out plastic bag charges or bans
  
• NSW EPA approves council plan to manage contamination
  
• NSW issues new pollution orders to Nestlé
  
• Canola mill instructed to investigate odours
  
• Fuel spill at Caltex terminal

• New WA environment department launches today
  
• NSW EPA approves Stockland's contamination management plan
  
• Nominations open for WA water awards

• EPA orders Caltex to detail contamination
  
• Yallourn coal mine granted third 'emergency discharge' approval
  
• NSW EPA issues penalty notice to Orica over Kooragang Island spill

• Environmental managers urge more license categories
  
• Appeal court overturns pesticide spray drift penalty
  
• Landowners fail in appeal over asbestos-contaminated fill

• SA EPA order inelegant, but not invalid
  
• NSW EPA approves Mitsubishi site contamination plan
  
• WA issues new policy on surplus mine water
  
• Council fined $31,500 over sewage pit that 'ran itself'

A Victorian tribunal has rejected arguments by a company that treats contaminated soils that a competitor's technology would not be best practice and should not be approved.