The NSW EPA has withdrawn an allegation of land pollution by Du Pont, after a court accepted company arguments that any off-site escape of herbicide from its Sydney factory might have occurred outside the 'charge period'.
A NSW court has rejected arguments by Du Pont that it can't be found guilty of land pollution because any chemical dust from its factory fell to the ground from the air, and was not directly applied to poisoned neighbouring gardens.
A company and director that spent more than $10 million complying with clean-up orders after a chemical fire blame poor firefighting for the contamination, but a related Supreme Court ruling on pollution insurance has gone against them.
A South Australian court has rejected a company's argument that it was not guilty of causing serious environmental harm because Shell owned the infrastructure on its site from which diesel fuel escaped.