Browsing: <a href="/tag/court-cases-fines">Court cases, fines</a> <i class="grey">•</i> <a href="/tag/corporate-strategies">Corporate strategies</a>

• Clean Energy Regulator accredits 23 new large-scale generators
  
• Company fined $50,000 for dumping asbestos waste
  
• Aged-care provider to reduce electricity use by up to 20%

• $38,500 fine for 'ten out of ten' Whitehaven
  
• AdBri penalised $136,000 for excess water take
  
• Toyota to establish hydrogen centre in Melbourne

*Tribunal rejects challenge to solar farm

* Projects backed by SIMEC ZEN and Nectar Farms seek licences

* Burgeoning global business interest in clean energy

• Mining company's solar PV plant back on track
  
• Court throws out challenge to $315,000 land-clearing fine
  
• State finalises major new water policy
  
• Water utility seeks approval for aquifer recharge

• Court issues $570,000 in penalties to company and directors
  
• Fonterra works with farmers to cut carbon emissions
  
• GPT adopts 'net zero' target

• Victoria to speed up quarry approval process
  
• Diesel spill leads to $105,000 penalty for council contractor
  
• Switch to 100% electric vehicles to deliver major operational savings for water utility

• Uranium mine operator to model 10,000 years of climate change
  
• Pollution from earthworks costs landowner $266,000
  
• Court orders repeat polluter to pay $85,000 for fake SITA dockets
  
• Engie and Energy Brix go their own ways on power station asbestos

The directors of a company that is involved in Emissions Reduction Fund carbon projects worth about $500 million are embroiled in a NSW Supreme Court dispute.

• BHP joins Rio Tinto in praising new Minerals Council climate policy
  
• Company refused hazwaste permit to export 10,000 tonnes of batteries
  
• False information to EPA leads to $75,000 fine

• Supreme Court to hear Lakes Oil damages claim over gas moratorium
  
• BCA urges states to dump renewables targets
  
• Electrolux plans 2MW solar PV and 500kW battery system