Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires premium-level Footprint access. Log in below or sign up here.

Macintosh and ANU team slam the "tortured" Chubb review

Two new reports from leading climate scientists at the Australian National University have slammed the "tortured" recommendations of the Chubb Review and warned that while they could improve the integrity of some ERF methods, they would leave other existing low-integrity methods untouched.

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Don't have premium Footprint access?

Footprint delivers the information and analysis you need to keep up to speed with your environmental and carbon compliance obligations.

A subscription to Footprint provides:

Email summaries to our latest content, delivered at a frequency of your choice; Access to our searchable library with thousands of news articles; Access to our calendar of events and links to relevant legislation, regulations and policies around Australia.

Subscribe for instant access